CDD isn’t asking a client for their driver’s licence and filing the scan.
I put that first because it’s the misread I hit most often, and most of the other mistakes follow from it.
The way I’d define customer due diligence, in plain terms: it’s working out who your customer is, whether someone else stands behind them, what risk they bring, and whether you can lawfully act for them at all. Identity is one input into one of those 4 things. On its own it doesn’t meet the obligation, and the bulk of the work happens before you provide the service, not after.
The 4 moves
Initial CDD, the version you run on a new client, is basically 4 moves.
- Collect the information that tells you who the customer is. For an individual that’s name, date of birth and address. For a company or trust it’s the entity’s details plus the real people behind it.
- Check that information against a reliable and independent source. This is the step people skip. A client telling you their name is not verification. A document or data source you didn’t simply take on the client’s word is.
- Work out the nature and purpose of the relationship, whether the client is acting for someone else, and who ultimately owns or controls them. Whereas identifying gives you the name on the file, this tells you whether the name on the file is the person who actually benefits.
- Rate the money laundering and terrorism financing risk this client brings, and decide whether standard checks are enough or whether you need to do more.
I think firms already do the first one without being told. They ask for ID.
Where small agencies and firms fall down, in my experience, is 2, 3 and 4. This is because those steps take judgment, they don’t produce a tidy artifact, and nobody chases you for them until something has already gone wrong.
The one I’d single out is verify. I’ve watched people treat it as a formality, a box ticked the moment the client hands something over, when verification is exactly where you decide whether to believe the file.
Timing
Initial CDD comes before you provide the service, not after it: not at settlement, and not when the file closes.
If you can’t establish who the client is on reasonable grounds, you can’t provide the service.
This is the part I’d watch most closely, because it cuts against how a deal feels. The client is in front of you, the matter is moving, and CDD is the step in the way.
My read is that the rule sits in the statute precisely because deferring it is the natural temptation. There are narrow exceptions for delayed verification, and being busy isn’t one of them.
It doesn’t stop at onboarding
CDD isn’t a one-time gate,
it’s ongoing. You monitor the relationship for transactions and behaviour that don’t fit what you’d expect, and you keep the client’s risk rating current.
For most small firms I’d call this a shift in mindset more than workload. The question moves from “did I check them at the start” to “would I still be comfortable acting for them today”.
2 dials sit on top of this.
If a client is genuinely low risk and nothing looks off, you can apply simplified CDD and do less. If a client is high risk, a foreign politically exposed person, money arriving from a high-risk country, an ownership structure you can’t see through, you must apply enhanced CDD and do more.
Enhanced CDD is its own subject, and I’ve written about it separately.
Where I’d start
If you’re starting from nothing, I’ll tell you where I’d start, and it isn’t with software.
Write down what your firm will collect, check and assess for each type of client you deal with, before the next client walks in.
Most firms make CDD calls one client at a time, in the moment, under time pressure. That’s how steps get skipped, and it’s how 2 clients in the same situation end up handled differently, which is its own exposure the day anyone looks back through your files.
A written process you can actually follow beats any tool on day 1. The tool earns its place later, once the volume makes doing it by hand impractical.
EDITOR NOTE (not for publication). Optional real-experience beat for Norland or Kitty to add if wanted: one true, de-identified observation from running CDD in practice, for example the kind of client or ownership structure that most often turns a routine onboarding into a beneficial-ownership exercise. Must be real.
The regulatory detail
What CDD is, in law
Customer due diligence sits in Part 2 of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth), with the core obligation at section 26F. CDD has 2 limbs: initial CDD, before you provide a designated service, and ongoing CDD, across the business relationship. The operational detail sits in the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules 2025, finalised on 29 August 2025.
Commencement for newly regulated entities
Tranche 2 entities, which include real estate professionals (table 5 of section 6), dealers in precious metals and stones, and the professional services in table 6 of section 6, become subject to CDD obligations on 1 July 2026. The wider CDD reform commenced on 31 March 2026 for entities regulated before that date. Newly regulated entities do not have the transitional arrangement that lets entities enrolled before 31 March 2026 keep using their old applicable customer identification procedure (ACIP) until 30 March 2029. From 1 July 2026, a Tranche 2 entity applies the reformed initial CDD framework to the customers it takes on from that date.
Initial CDD
Initial CDD obligations are at section 28, with related provisions at sections 136 to 141. You must complete initial CDD before you start providing a customer with a designated service. You do this by establishing certain matters on reasonable grounds. If you cannot establish them on reasonable grounds, you must not provide the service.
The matters you establish on reasonable grounds include: the customer’s identity, and that they are who they claim to be; whether the customer is acting on behalf of another person, and that person’s identity; the identity of any person acting on behalf of the customer, and their authority to act; if the customer is not an individual, the identity of the customer’s beneficial owners; and whether the customer, any beneficial owner, or any person on whose behalf the customer is receiving the service is a politically exposed person (PEP) or designated for targeted financial sanctions.
You collect KYC information appropriate to the customer’s ML/TF risk and verify it using reliable and independent data appropriate to that risk. “KYC information” is the collective term for the information you collect and verify.
Delayed initial CDD
Section 28(2) and section 111, together with Rules sections 6-21 and 6-23, set out the limited circumstances in which you may start providing a designated service before completing initial CDD. These are exceptions, not a general option.
Simplified CDD
Section 31 and Rules section 6-16 govern simplified CDD. Simplified CDD lets you apply lighter identification and verification for certain low-risk customers where no red flags are present. It is not an exemption from your initial or ongoing CDD obligations.
Enhanced CDD
Section 32 and Rules section 6-20 govern enhanced CDD. You must apply enhanced CDD in the circumstances set out in those provisions, which include a customer or beneficial owner who is a foreign PEP, higher ML/TF risk such as a high-risk jurisdiction, and a situation where you have submitted a suspicious matter report and continue to provide services. Enhanced CDD measures can include obtaining source of funds or source of wealth information, senior management approval, and more frequent monitoring. Enhanced CDD may apply during initial CDD, ongoing CDD, or both.
Beneficial owners
A beneficial owner is an individual who, directly or indirectly, owns 25% or more of a customer that is not an individual, or who controls that customer. Control is defined at section 11 of the Act and covers formal control through ownership and voting rights as well as control through practical influence. Where ownership runs through a chain of entities, you follow the chain until you identify the individuals who meet the definition, and you keep records showing how you traced each link.
Ongoing CDD
Ongoing CDD obligations are at sections 30, 32 and 39D. You monitor customers to identify, assess, manage and mitigate ML/TF risk across the relationship, including monitoring for unusual transactions and behaviour and for matters that may require a suspicious matter report. Simplified ongoing CDD is available in limited circumstances under sections 30 and 41 and Rules section 6-35.
Records
You keep records of the KYC information you collected and verified, of how you identified and verified beneficial owners, and of your CDD decisions, and you must be able to produce them. Record-keeping carries its own 7-year rule, covered separately.
Penalties
Failing to meet CDD obligations is a civil penalty contravention. The civil penalty maximum is 100,000 penalty units for a body corporate and 20,000 penalty units for an individual. A penalty unit was $364 on and after 1 July 2026, the unit count stays the same.
Frequently asked questions
When do real estate agencies and law firms have to start doing CDD?
From 1 July 2026, for customers you take on from that date. That is when Tranche 2 CDD obligations commence for newly regulated entities.
Is CDD just identity verification?
No. Collecting and verifying identity is part of it. CDD also requires you to understand the nature and purpose of the relationship, identify anyone the customer is acting for and the customer’s beneficial owners, and assess and monitor ML/TF risk.
Can I provide the service first and verify the client later?
Only in limited circumstances. The default under section 28 is that initial CDD is completed before you provide the designated service. Delayed verification is a narrow exception under section 28(2) and section 111, not a general allowance.
What is a “reliable and independent source”?
It is information you can stand behind to verify the KYC information you collected, rather than relying solely on the customer’s own word, for example an identity document or an independent data source. What is appropriate depends on the customer’s ML/TF risk.
What is the difference between initial and ongoing CDD?
Initial CDD is what you do before you start acting for a customer. Ongoing CDD is the monitoring and updating you do for as long as the relationship lasts.
When do I have to do more than standard CDD?
When enhanced CDD is triggered, including foreign PEPs, high-risk jurisdictions, a suspicious matter report, and the other higher-risk circumstances set out in section 32 and Rules section 6-20.
Who is a beneficial owner?
An individual who ultimately owns 25% or more of a non-individual customer, or who controls it. You trace ownership through any chain of companies or trusts to the real people behind the customer.
Homepedia runs HP-KYC, a customer due diligence and record-keeping tool built for Tranche 2 real estate agencies and law firms. Details here: [link to homepedia.com.au product page].
Sources
- Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth). Federal Register of Legislation. Part 2, and sections 11, 26F, 28, 30, 31, 32, 39D, 41, 111, and 136 to 141.
- Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules 2025 (Cth). Federal Register of Legislation. Part 6, including sections 6-16, 6-20, 6-21, 6-23 and 6-35.
- AUSTRAC, Future Law Compilation of the AML/CTF Act, showing the Act as expected to read at 1 July 2026.
- AUSTRAC, Overview of customer due diligence (Reform)
- AUSTRAC, Overview of initial customer due diligence (Reform)
- AUSTRAC, Overview of ongoing customer due diligence (Reform)
- AUSTRAC, Enhanced customer due diligence (Reform)
- AUSTRAC, Determining ownership and control structures (Reform)
- AUSTRAC, Transitioning existing customers (Reform)
- Department of Home Affairs, Overview of the AML/CTF Amendment Act
- Law Society of New South Wales, AML/CTF Hub
- FATF, The FATF Recommendations, Recommendation 10 (Customer due diligence)
This article is general information about Australian AML/CTF obligations. It is not legal advice. For how these obligations apply to your firm, get advice from a qualified compliance professional.

2 Comments
Comments are closed.